Clinical and cytological characteristics of the course of the wound process after uranoplasty in children with congenital cleft lip and palate

Clinical and cytological characteristics of the course of the wound process after uranoplasty in children with congenital cleft lip and palate

Authors

  • Г.А. Икрамов кафедры детской челюстно-лицевой хирургии ТГСИ
  • У.А Хатамов кафедры челюстно-лицевой хирургии ТГСИ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-3036

Keywords:

congenital cleft lip and palate, cytological examination of the oral mucosa, infected wound, suture divergence

Abstract

Purpose of the study. Study of the course of wound healing after uranoplasty in children with congenital
cleft lip and palate. Material and methods. To study the processes of regeneration, a cytological study of smears from
the lateral sections of the palate wounds was carried out. The study found that regardless of the method of postoperative
care in all the studied groups, the repair process has a phase character. Results and its discussion. With traditional
treatment, in 7 (50%) of 21 children, the wound became infected, and inflammatory phenomena developed in the
soft palate (along line A) and uvula. As a result of treatment, on the 4-5th day, the sutures were in an unsatisfactory
condition. In 2 children, by the 8-9th day of treatment, a partial divergence of the sutures was observed. In 5 children, the
postoperative wound healed by secondary healing, which led to palatopharyngeal insufficiency. Conclusions. A study
of the cytology of the mucous membrane of the hard palate after surgery showed that the healing of a postoperative
wound characterizes one of the sides of the adaptive-compensatory reactions of the body.

References

Кузин М.И., Костюченок Б.М. Раны и раневая инфекция: Руко водство для врачей. – М., 1990. – 170 с.

Дьякова С.В., Яковлев С.В., Першина М.А. Современный под- ход к диспансеризации детей с врожденной патологией че- люстно-лицевой области // Врожденная и наследственная патология головы, лица и шеи у детей: актуальные вопросы комплексного лечения: Материалы 2-й Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. – М., 2006. – С. 85-89.

Nagy K., Mommaerts M.Y. Postoperative wound management after cleft lip surgery // Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. – 2011. Vol. 48, №5. – Р. 584-586.

Rawashdeh M.A., Ayesh J.A., Darwazeh A.M. Oral candidal colonization in cleft patients as a function of age, gender, В surgery, type of cleft, and oral health // J. Oral Maxillofacial. Surg. – 2011. – Vol. 69, №4. – P. 1207-1213.

Schliephake H., |Donnerstag F., Berten J.L, Lonquist N. Palate morphology after unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate closure // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 35, №1. – P. 25-30.

Zhang Z., Fang S., Zhang Q. et al. Analysis of complications in primary cleft and palates surgery // J. Craniofac. Surg. – 2014. – Vol. 25, №3. – P. 968-971

Downloads

Published

2022-09-05

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.